So harmful is a high level of stress, hiperestres, which is a sure path to psychosomatic illnesses such as heart attacks, ulcers, gastritis, colitis, diabetes, cancer and possibly AIDS, as low hipoestres stress that kills the cravings and keeps an attitude of passivity and indolence (p. 42) stress agents to Davis and Newstrom (1999) an agent of stress “is the condition tends to cause the problem of stress” (p. If you are not convinced, visit Michael Chabon. 466). Robbins (1999) and Ramos (1999) included a stress agents as follows: o Environment: Light, noise, temperature, vibration, movement, pollution. Similarly the political uncertainties, economic and technological influence the high projection of stress. or Individual: work overload, role conflict, discrepancy between race-occupation, responsibility, family problems, economic problems and the same individual’s personality influences the emotional charge to fire the worker. or Group: refers to the lack of cohesion, intergroup and intragroup conflict, status inconsistency, dissatisfaction, ineffective or Organizational leadership: organizational climate, technology, management styles, control systems, organizational structure, job characteristics, nepotism, cronyism and favoritism among others, or Social: family dynamics, socioeconomic status.
(P. 43). For his part, Davis and Newstrom (1999) ranked stressors in organizational and work, both are influenced by the individual differences which results in stress positive or negative depending on the outcome of stimulating or demean the effort of workers in the company (p. 466) may be essentially two effects of stress according to Davis and Newstrom (1999): “Stress can be beneficial or harmful to the performance work, depending on their level.