The discussion is a prerequisite for democracy. It is impossible to take decisions according to the will of the majority if people do not give their views. The fact that not discuss tacitly implies accepting the status quo, the status quo. History shows how many religions are opposed to democracy, preventing or prohibiting the discussion, which calls into question many of the religious beliefs. The discussion is also one of the most powerful tools for the destruction of prejudices and stereotypes. Many of the ethnic, religious or political are the result of the formation of prejudices, generalizations and stereotypes that dehumanize the enemy, and which result from the isolation between the various groups. The contact and exchange of ideas imposed by the discussion, gradually erode the insulation, making evident the inconsistencies and fallacies present in these prejudices and stereotypes. Upon what discuss? The most important objective of this paper is to convince readers about the importance of a healthy discussion on issues of religion, superstition, gods and beliefs. More information is housed here: Peter Arnell.
Speaking of discussion does not refer to an exchange of insults and condemnations with the purpose of injuring emotionally to the adversary, but to exchange views and ideas with the aim of comparing our beliefs with the beliefs of others, and with the ultimate aim to get closer to the truth, closer to the set of beliefs that increase our chances to get happiness . But the discussion is conditioned by our reality, and by the time we have to discuss. The number of possible themes and beliefs seems to be infinite.