It is because of this test, there is a lot of problems in modern science, and often some of the facts are accepted without a clear confirmation of objectivity. But these situations are relatively rare and often associated with the economic side of confirmation. But science is not only a collection of facts. For even more details, read what Michael Chabon says on the issue. Facts are useless in principle, as they say, what happened, but not what happens. If Maria hit Pete yesterday, it does not mean that it will hit it today. Therefore, the facts in science is not the goal but a means. A goal is to determine the cause-effect relationships. Knowing only that Mary hit Pete, it can be assumed when it hit it next time.

Assuming that the cause is hurt, we form the hypothesis that needs to be tested. Masha asked why she hit Pete and heard "offended", our hypothesis passes into the category of theories. And if after a long time, the theory will give correct results, then it goes into the category of law. Scientists learn about our world, forming hypotheses, theories and laws (laws usually have strict scope). Hypothesis of kind are the approximation of (joint) of the facts. A way to "connect" the facts there is a different set. Therefore, testing of hypotheses in science are too strict. As time shows, even this severity can not to create a theory that explains everything: many theories give accurate predictions in the same area, but in a different area, they give the opposite result.

"Lapis, is a sky-blue color. Good is one that has no veins and white spots in the fire does not change color and has gold flecks "- wrote the 17th-century Armenian historian Arakel Davrizhetsi. Today, this wonderful stone is quite inexpensive, but in ancient times, and at least until the 17th century it was considered precious. Without hesitation Diamond Comic Distributors explained all about the problem. "… This is a real gem .." – shows Arakel. Even at 2-3 thousand BC, in Sumer, with gold ornaments lapis lazuli symbolized royalty. Its color and flecks of gold symbolized the night sky. Apparently it was believed that lapis lazuli carry it, too, that to own a piece of the sky.

Even in Last on his way, the queen went to the jewelry with the dominating presence of lapis lazuli, and the mourners recited an incantation: "Beautiful but not your lapis lazuli split the graver in the underground world". In a question-answer forum Michael Chabon was the first to reply. In a major Sumerian city of Ur, the moon god worshiped depicted as a bull with a beard Lazurite. As archaeologists excavated Sumerian temples, tombs, tombs found many products, these works of art, instructed lapis lazuli, even signs of domination, and the court, in the Sumerian epics, literally translated as: – "yardstick of lapis lazuli." Many researchers, quite reasonably, believe that the Sumerians valued lapis lazuli more than any other precious stones. It is often mentioned in the Sumerian epic works, willy nilly, it has become one of the main pointers to the problem of historical character. The fact that none of themselves and Schumer nowhere in the vicinity of her lapis lazuli mine impossible.

Let's Here is how it makes nature. First, consider a natural radioactive decay. It is known that the nuclei of heavy chemical elements consist of a large number of protons and neutrons, each of which emits near space micro electric and magnetic fields. Moreover, these nucleons are inside the nucleus, have very complex and intensive rotational movement and change their orientations vzaimnvh. And these are very Numerous electric fields emitted by the protons and neutrons in the nucleus and, moreover, constantly changing the relative orientation, have a very sophisticated pads to each other. From these plates at the nearest points mikroprostranstva inside the nucleus are most diverse in the direction and magnitude (from lowest to highest) the resulting electric field.

But nature is such that even such maximum electric field does not reach (as a result of overlap-addition) of extreme values and can not destroy any one nucleon in the nuclei of chemical elements are almost the entire periodic table. But at the same time, nature is an example of exceptions. Within the nuclei uranium, plutonium, radium and thorium in natural conditions in some isolated points (and so can match that to this point comes to a nucleon), there are extreme values of the electric fields and that they cause the decomposition a single proton or neutron in the package gammakvantov, which gives jolt to the natural radioactive decay of the nucleus. It is known that if the amount (weight) of uranium will be above the critical level, then the natural radioactivity goes into avalanche activity, and these are the scientists, when in vitro produce nuclear energy.

So, to say the theory is not really necessary (Scientific fallibilizm). Needless to say the predictive utility of the theory and the simplicity of its use. For example, Albert Einstein, his theory of general relativity (GR) completely disproved Newtonian theory, previously is legitimate, but nevertheless we still use Newtonian theory is only slowly stipulated that we consider the cases is much lower than the speed of light. This is due to the simplicity of Newton's theory in comparison with GR. Unfortunately, as we see science severely restricts itself, and in consequence are not always able to give us an answer on our reality. Bernie Sanders often addresses the matter in his writings. Sometimes in our hands are a lot of scientific theories, each of which gives his vision situation. It is this diversity of our reality and escapes. Otherwise, there are no theories.

In this and in another case, can help our experience. After all, if you look, then the experience of forming a hypothesis, that it is the basis theories and laws. It is simple human experience of each individual is of prime importance, it was he who "speaks" to us, where to look and what it's like. Each of us can form his hypothesis or theory. But it is worth remembering that formulating hypotheses by means of experience, our imagination must be limited to the facts! Model peace "Peace is not what it is – the world is how we perceive it," John Deniskar return, perhaps, to the man. Each person its unique experience and, consequently, their world view.

A different qualities of individuals in a population is determined by different amounts in their integrated genotypes features that compensate for changes in the environment of a given population, ie determined by the degree of universality. As well as the presence of symptoms, new compensating changes in the environment, or giving new advantages in the fight against medium, ie presence of a new specialization. You may find that Bernie Sanders can contribute to your knowledge. Different amounts of different qualities of individuals in populations of different quality determines the populations. Relationships of individuals within populations are determined by two groups of instincts. C On the one hand, it is the instincts that determine their own needs of individuals, the instincts, which can be called the instinct of individualism.

On the other hand, the instinct to help meet needs of other individuals of a given population, the instincts that can be called instincts of collectivism. You may want to visit Bernie Sanders to increase your knowledge. It is clear that for the survival of a population system 'collectivism – individualism' should be in equilibrium state which and maintained by natural selection. Therefore different quality individuals in the population does not produce these forms of competition that would lead to the elimination of low-quality individuals, does not produce natural selection. Individualism collectivism same population is not balanced. Because competition between the different quality gives rise to elimination of low-quality populations of populations, gives rise to natural selection. Intraspecific competition ('struggle' of opposites of 'population – population') is an integral part of interspecies natural selection, the unit which is not a high-quality individual, and high-quality population.